Exayard Review: Is AI Takeoff Worth the Usage Bill?
Exayard review checked October 2026: per-seat pricing, AI usage charges, estimating limits and data terms for contractors choosing takeoff software.
Exayard review checked October 2026: per-seat pricing, AI usage charges, estimating limits and data terms for contractors choosing takeoff software.
Exayard is a conditional choice for trade contractors who bid from drawings and have a qualified estimator to verify AI quantities and pricing. Start with a small paid evaluation only after confirming usage costs, signup terms and permission to upload project documents.
Moderate confidence: confirm several things in writing before committing.
The score measures how much a buyer can check before committing to Exayard, not how well the software performs. We research products; we do not test them. How the score works.
Exayard is a conditional choice for trade contractors who bid from drawings and have a qualified estimator to verify AI quantities and pricing. Its published workflow connects plan measurement, priced line items and bids. Start with a small paid evaluation only after confirming usage costs, signup terms and permission to upload project documents.
Contractors needing unchecked, fixed-cost AI bidding or confidential-plan handling without a separate agreement should look elsewhere. Exayard’s terms require independent verification, charge for AI work even when results disappoint, and grant broad rights to use uploaded content for model training.
This review draws on Exayard’s published pricing, help documentation and terms. Prices, plan features and terms were checked on October 7, 2026.
Exayard’s pricing page lists per-seat prices before tax. Its subscription guide says annual billing costs ten times the monthly price; the annual totals below follow that rule.
| Plan and source | Monthly price | Annual price | Included users | Gate that matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free, subscription guide | $0 | Not applicable | Any number | After cancellation; bids open/export only, price book and QuickBooks view-only |
| Starter, subscription guide | $99/user | $990/user | One per paid seat; any number purchasable | Sending and editing bids, price book, trade packs and QuickBooks |
| Professional, subscription guide | $249/user | $2,490/user | One per paid seat; any number purchasable | Custom templates, revision compare, alternates and live supplier prices |
| Enterprise, pricing page | Custom | Custom | Per-seat quote | Custom integrations, account manager, SLA and volume discounts |
On annual billing, Starter costs $990 per user a year, about $82.50 a month, calculated from the subscription guide. Monthly billing is the safer initial commitment because the refund terms are strict and actual AI consumption needs measuring.
For a business buying five paid seats, the published rates produce a base bill of $495/month on Starter or $1,245/month on Professional, before tax and extra usage. Count the people who need access before budgeting: unlimited seat availability still carries a per-seat charge. The subscription guide says seats share one AI pool, with $150 per Starter seat or $375 per Professional seat each month, giving five seats $750 or $1,875 respectively.
Starter suits an owner estimating their own work because the subscription guide includes takeoffs, bids, a price book and trade starter packs. A small shop using those supplied packs should establish its workflow there before paying for custom structures.
Professional becomes relevant when the business needs reusable company-specific estimates:
The subscription guide says higher plans run uploads and takeoffs at the same speed. Upgrade for features or usage capacity, rather than expecting faster processing.
Enterprise is worth discussing when custom integration support or a service commitment is required. Exayard’s developer page also lists dedicated Slack channels and a named technical contact for Enterprise. Get those deliverables written into the agreement before choosing a custom-priced plan.
Exayard’s takeoff page describes counts, lengths, areas and volumes derived from area and depth. Its project guide accepts PDFs, JPEG, PNG, TIFF and DWG, DXF and DGN drawings, with separate scales for individual pages.
That supports a practical drawing-to-estimate workflow, provided someone checks calibration and scope. The project guide specifically advises verifying scale when switching pages. A representative evaluation should include mixed-scale sheets and the symbols the contractor actually bids.
Three checks belong before submission:
Exa can add estimate items and work with project data, according to the plan-question guide. That guide also says it cannot browse the internet or external databases, and current material-price questions require configured vendor pricing. Handwriting and non-standard symbols can reduce interpretation accuracy.
The consequence is a review-led workflow. Measure any benefit after correcting quantities and pricing, because the terms keep responsibility for submitted bids with the contractor and require disclosure when AI output is passed to clients.
Exayard’s PlanSwift import guide says a zipped job folder brings across pages, calibrated scales, count/linear/area measurements, folders and attached cost items. Simple unit prices transfer directly.
Formula-driven prices arrive as notes for re-entry, and saved template libraries do not transfer, according to that same import guide. The import can finish while listing skipped content. A formula-heavy shop should reconcile one complete job before moving its estimating history.
For handoff, Exayard’s export guide supports annotated-plan printing, saving as PDF and downloading originals. Hidden annotations stay out of exports, and printed exports are rasterized. Check the actual deliverable against the recipient’s requirements, especially where editable drawing content matters.
Exayard lists QuickBooks from Starter on its pricing page. Confirm QuickBooks Online support, record types, sync direction and how corrections travel between systems. A contractor relying on accounting integration should require a demonstration using its intended workflow before purchase.
For broader automation, Exayard’s developer page lists REST, MCP, webhooks, a CLI and connections for tools including Claude, ChatGPT, Zapier, n8n and Make. The subscription guide and terms explicitly allow developer access on Free as well as paid plans; AI work started through integrations still consumes usage.
Website lead handling has a separate, concrete use. Exayard’s dashboard guide says widget leads can open as projects. Its widget integration guide supports Slack and Telegram conversations plus Calendly or Cal.com booking, with only one scheduling provider active at a time.
That may suit a contractor collecting inquiries before estimating. Confirm dispatch, field scheduling and any other required service workflow separately rather than choosing from the integration list alone.
Exayard’s usage guide lists $150 of monthly AI work per Starter seat, roughly ten drawing sheets, and $375 per Professional seat, roughly twenty-five sheets. Paid seats contribute to one company pool. Annual subscriptions still refill monthly.
The same usage guide puts an average sheet at about $15 of AI work, with busy sheets costing more. Takeoffs, sheet reads, analysis and Exa questions all consume usage. Budget from total activity rather than treating the sheet estimate as a guaranteed allowance.
Buyer warning: Exayard’s usage guide says unused paid usage carries over for two months, while its terms say three more months; its extra-usage guide says extra usage never goes past the monthly limit, while the terms allow running work to push charges slightly past it. Budget around the shorter rollover and allow headroom above the limit until Exayard confirms the applicable rules.
The terms also allow credit prices and task consumption rates to change without advance notice. A cut to the usage included in a plan takes effect from the next billing cycle, according to the terms.
They charge for AI work that incurs provider costs even if it fails, stops partway or produces an unwanted result. Repeated attempts can therefore consume the budget without producing an approved takeoff.
Keep automatic top-ups off during the initial evaluation. Exayard’s usage-tracking guide provides event-level costs and CSV downloads, with up to ninety days of visible history. Export those records to judge recurring cost from completed, checked estimates. The usage guide says admins receive email and in-app alerts at 80% and 100% of monthly AI usage and of the extra-usage limit.
The recurring seat price is only one part of the purchase. Exayard’s help documentation identifies several additional cost controls:
Restrict billing administration to people authorized to spend. Exayard’s payment guide says the default saved card handles both renewals and extra usage, so either can reach the same account.
Exayard’s subscription guide says the first payment locks the organization’s billing currency for all later charges, including extra usage, so confirm the currency before paying.
The pricing page says local prices are reviewed every six months.
Buyer warning: The pricing page says existing subscribers keep their price for twelve months after a change, while the terms allow subscription increases at the end of the current cycle with reasonable notice. Exayard’s terms say support and marketing statements do not amend the agreement, so budget from the terms and get any price protection in a signed agreement.
No customer reviews or platform ratings support this review. There is no basis here for an overall star rating, review count or claim about typical customer outcomes.
The buying decision should therefore depend on a bounded evaluation and references from contractors doing comparable work. Ask a reference about correction effort, difficult drawings, support response and the final bill. Those answers are more useful than a general endorsement when the product charges for AI activity and still requires professional verification.
Exayard’s terms grant a perpetual, irrevocable license to use uploaded content and interactions for training, evaluation and product development, unless another agreement provides otherwise. The license also covers material submitted through demo and contact forms. Derivative datasets and trained models may survive deletion of the source documents.
The same terms say raw uploaded documents will not be sold or published, and eligible customers may request exclusion from model training. Confirm eligibility and secure the arrangement before uploading restricted client drawings. The terms expressly prohibit classified information, CUI and ITAR-controlled data.
The terms also license the customer’s name and logo for marketing; this can be revoked by email, although Exayard has no obligation to remove already published materials.
Pricing libraries need attention too. Exayard’s template guide says new collections default to Public visibility. Change visibility before storing proprietary assemblies, and check third-party cost-data licenses: the terms require permission for the uses Exayard claims.
Exayard’s subscription guide says there are no trials and every new account starts paid, while its terms allow discretionary trials, normally without a payment method. Budget for paid signup unless Exayard confirms a specific offer, including duration, AI allowance and charging rules. The terms refer to a demo request form; drawings sent through it fall under the training license.
The setup guide reinforces paid onboarding by directing plan selection into checkout. The homepage separately advertises a free website agent without a card; confirm that offer’s scope before assuming it includes an estimating trial.
If a trial requires payment details, the terms say it automatically charges on the last trial day unless cancelled. Trial usage and plan-switching rights should be confirmed for the particular offer.
For paid subscriptions, the rules are firm:
Cancellation is preferable to account deletion when continued access matters. The terms require exporting wanted content before termination and say unused credits are forfeited when the account ends.
A drawing-based estimating shop can justify a limited evaluation because Exayard connects measurement, pricing and bids, with documented import and export paths. Starter is the logical initial tier when supplied trade packs fit; Professional is justified by custom templates and revision workflows under the subscription guide.
Commit only after a representative job produces a checked estimate at an acceptable total cost, the required accounting workflow is demonstrated, and document permissions are settled.
Buildxact is a conditional recommendation for residential builders and remodelers that want takeoffs, quotes and job costs connected. Pro is the practical starting point for managing construction, but buyers should confirm plan inclusions in writing, because Buildxact's own pages disagree on several of them.
Read review →Transparent, all-features-included construction management pricing with strong job costing; demo scheduling and field workflows before committing.
Read review →Contractor Foreman is a conditional choice for small general contractors and remodelers that want estimating, job costing, scheduling, and field records together. Plus is the practical starting point, provided the team can invest in setup and obtain written clarification of refund terms.
Read review →